Blank Da 2166 9 1 Form

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is essential to follow specific guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Below is a list of dos and don'ts to consider:

• Do ensure all personal information is accurate, including name, SSN, and rank.
• Do use the correct format for dates, specifically YYYYMMDD.
• Do double-check the email addresses provided for the rater and senior rater.
• Do provide clear and concise descriptions of duties and responsibilities.
• Don't leave any required fields blank; all sections must be completed.
• Don't use informal language or abbreviations that may cause confusion.
• Don't forget to include the number of enclosures when applicable.
• Don't sign the form without verifying that all information is correct.

1. What is the purpose of the DA Form 2166-9-1?

   The DA Form 2166-9-1 is primarily used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the rank of Sergeant. It serves as a formal record of an NCO's performance, providing a structured way to assess their duties, responsibilities, and overall potential within the Army.

2. Who is responsible for filling out the DA Form 2166-9-1?

   The form is completed by the rater, who is typically the NCO’s immediate supervisor. The senior rater also plays a crucial role in the evaluation process, providing an additional layer of assessment regarding the NCO's performance and potential.

3. What information is required in Part I of the form?

   Part I contains administrative data, including the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, date of rank, unit information, and the period covered by the evaluation. Accurate completion of this section is vital, as it ensures the evaluation is properly attributed to the correct individual.

4. What does the rater evaluate in Part IV?

   In Part IV, the rater assesses various performance attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership abilities, development skills, and overall achievement. Each area is rated as either "MET" or "DID NOT MEET STANDARD," allowing for specific comments to be provided for clarity and context.

5. What is the significance of the counseling dates in Part II?

   The counseling dates in Part II are essential as they document when the NCO received feedback about their performance. This ensures that the NCO is aware of their standing and has had the opportunity to address any concerns prior to the evaluation being finalized.

6. How does the senior rater contribute to the evaluation?

   The senior rater provides an overall assessment of the NCO's potential compared to others in the same grade. This includes selecting a qualification level—ranging from "Most Qualified" to "Not Qualified"—and offering comments that highlight the NCO's future potential within the Army.

7. What is the role of the supplementary reviewer?

   The supplementary reviewer, if applicable, adds an additional layer of oversight to the evaluation process. They may provide comments and sign off on the evaluation to ensure that it meets the necessary standards and reflects a fair assessment of the NCO's performance.

8. What happens if an NCO disagrees with their evaluation?

   If an NCO disagrees with their evaluation, they have the right to appeal. The appeals process is outlined in AR 623-3, allowing the NCO to formally contest the ratings and comments made by the rater and senior rater. This process ensures that concerns are addressed appropriately.

9. Where can I find more information about the DA Form 2166-9-1?

   Additional information about the DA Form 2166-9-1 can be found in AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3. These documents provide comprehensive guidelines on the evaluation process, including instructions for completing the form and understanding the associated policies.